Skip to main content

Singer 201-2: sewing on a machine older than my parents

I am trying to cultivate a "buy-it-for-life" mindset.  When I was looking into sewing machines, I found plenty of machines that seemed to be in my price range ($100-150) with decent reviews.  I wasn't expecting a powerhouse of a machine, but if I was spending a hundred dollars on it, I wanted it to last a while. 

But as I dug deeper into reviews, I kept seeing things like "this machine broke after x months of use, and it can't be repaired since it's completely plastic on the inside".  (Plastic consumption/its widespread use is a whole 'nother issue). 

I couldn't justify spending over a hundred dollars on a chunk of plastic that would break and become unrepairable


So I decided to look into more durable machines that were still in my price range, namely vintage Singer machines.  I knew that the vintage ones were all metal (most are cast-iron, very heavy!) and figured they'd be relatively simple to repair since they were relatively simple machines.  The vast majority are straight stitch only!  Some don't even go backwards! 

I went to thrift stores until I found one I really, really liked.  I had seen a few others but they were too small (I wanted one with a larger throat), far too expensive, or in absolutely terrible condition.

Here's the one I got!  After a thorough servicing/wipe-down.

I actually didn't know if it worked or not, because the power cord was nowhere to be seen at the time or purchase...  I ordered a generic power cord off Amazon later. 

But there were a few reasons I picked this one:

1) No pitting/huge rust spots (even on the bottom).  Only the chrome surfaces had some very superficial rust.

2) The wiring seemed to be in good condition. 

3) Electric, potted motor!  I didn't want a treadle or hand-turned machine (though... I kind of want a hand-turn one just for the novelty now...)

4) Large throat space!

5) The handwheel turned smoothly, and there weren't any catches/clicks/grinding. 

6) It was 35 dollars.

I took it home and used this guide to identify it.  

This serial number look-up confirmed it was a 201 model, made around January 1950.

1950!  How crazy is that!

Sounds kind of rough...

I inspected the wiring and deemed it safe enough to plug in and not cause an electrical fire.  It didn't catch fire, but it did not sound like it was ready to sew anything any time soon. 

Thankfully there's a local business, run by a very sweet older gentleman, who is continuing his father's business.  He came out to my apartment and did a very thorough clean-up, timing adjustment, basic "how-to", plus a history lesson.

He showed me how to thread it, told me to not use upholstery-weight thread (oops), especially not as the top thread combined with a regular-weight cotton thread on the bottom (double oops), and told me I made a good purchase, since the 201-2 is a very good machine, and mine was in fairly good condition.  His visit cost about $120, or far more than the machine cost!  But it was definitely worth it. 

Features of the Singer 201-2:
  • Adjustable stitch width.  Six to thirty stitches per inch.  
  • Forward and reverse!  
  • Feed dogs can be lowered. 
  • Can be used as a workout aid (not really, please use actual dumbbells). 
And that's about it.  There are a variety of attachments (buttonholer, zig-zag, embroidery!) but by itself, the 201-2 can only do a plain old straight stitch.  But it does it very, very well.

I purchased this machine almost a year ago.  Since then, I've made clothing, quilts, pillow covers, and a variety of other things on it.  It's still stitching beautifully.

I've also purchased a cabinet, buttonholer, zigzag attachment, and LED bulb for it.  I've definitely exceeded my initial budget of $100-150, but I don't have any regrets.  

Where my 201-2 currently lives, a wonderful Singer cabinet!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I bought a Silver Reed SK10 and SR10 knitting machine!

I've been considering a CSM (circular sock machine) for a while, but my budget has kept me from buying one.  I really want the ability to crank out sock snakes and hand-finish the heels and toes.  I discounted flat-bed machines because how would you knit in the round on a flat-bed machine?   And then I stumbled on a post that said you can in fact knit in the round, or, knit tubular as machine knitters are more likely to say, on a flat-bed machine.  The secret?  A ribbing attachment!  (Or a double bed machine, but those are fairly rare).  So I started the hunt for a knitting machine and ribbing attachment.  I found the perfect machine for me a few weeks ago.  Here it is knitting a ribbed cowl :

Renulek's Rose #3

 Finished product first, of course.      

First (ish) roll from my new to me Kalimar SR200

A few weeks ago, I got a Helios 44 lens, which happened to be attached to a Kalimar SR200/Zenit E camera.  The seller wasn't sure the camera worked, but mechanically, it seemed to function.  The light meter even seemed to work!   The first roll I shot in the camera came out totally blank.  Which was disappointing.  I think the issue is the film holder is very fiddly, either from wear or age.  But I'm happy to report that the second roll was totally fine!  I got 32 photos, despite the back being opened once accidentally during rewinding...