Skip to main content

Learning to tat! With yarn, not ink

 

Tatting is a surprisingly ambiguous word.  Yarn or ink?  Both can involve needles, technically! 

I enjoy picking up new yarn hobbies, and I've only ever heard of tatting -- never seen examples of it, or met anyone else who tats, or even knows what tatting is ("like tattoos?"). Tatting is a pretty old fibercraft, and is much less efficient at creating fabric than knitting or crochet or weaving.  I think it's primarily a decorative craft, as tatted fabric is fairly open and lacey, and would not drape well.  

In any case, I finally purchased some tatting shuttles and needles and embarked on a short YouTube tutorial journey.  

 

It seems like most tatting tutorials and patterns are geared toward shuttle tatting.  Needle tatting is much easier to learn than shuttle tatting, says the internet.  I would agree with this claim.  

I tried shuttle tatting first because the shuttles arrived a few days before the needles did.  It did not go well.  

These are some of my first few attempts.  The very first attempt is not pictured here because it was just a mass of tangled thread.  Getting the knot to flip was difficult and I failed to do so quite a few times, so rings didn't close properly. 

 
 
Overall, it was slow and painful.  I was able to get a few rings on the same thread, but as you can see, sometimes they didn't close, there were large gaps between them unintentionally, and some just are not properly formed.  

My first attempts at needle tatting went fairly well by comparison.  My actual first attempt at needle tatting is on the left -- I was able to make a ring and close it.  On the right are attempts at following a pattern. 


My main issue with shuttle tatting was I was pulling the thread too tightly, and that issue is fully eliminated with needle tatting, since the tension is limited by the circumfrence of the needle.  Another issue I had with shuttle tatting was flipping the knot -- again, that's not an issue at all with needle tatting since stitches are formed directly on the needle rather than on the thread itself.  

I made some doilies with a variety of threads.  The rainbow was the first one (and has a mistake!), then the pink, then the green.   Pattern from be-stitched



I learned from these doilies that you can needle tat from the ball -- ie thread your needle with a long thread, and then make stitches with the ball thread, rather than that long thread.  

I have also learned since completing these that the stitch after a picot counts as a stitch, and not a picot.  I thought "picot" meant "leave a space, do a stitch", but it really just means "leave a space before your next action".  Which may explain why those doilies are a bit floppy.  

I kept trying shuttle tatting every now and then.  I'd pick up a shuttle and try a ring, fail, and put the shuttle down.  The rings got better with time.  Eventually I was able to make a ring whenever I wanted to.  Then I tried picots -- getting the stitches to stay flipped after a picot introduced a new challenge. 

After a while, picots became easier and more consistent.  For the doilies, I had to learn how to do a chain, and that was the next thing I tried with shuttle tatting.  Like needle tatting, you need two separate yarns going at once to make a chain (as far as I know).  So I also learned how to manage two shuttles at once.  

I found a new pattern from Tatting by the Bay's free pattern section: Solstice.  I thought it was appropriate to try out since summer solstice was coming up at the time.  

I wanted to see if needle tatting would work, and the bottom left is the needle tatted attempt.  I was reversing work improperly, but think it would have worked if I continued.  The stitches in that sample are even and tidy, and everything lies flat, unlike the other samples.  

The top left piece was the first try.  I was posting the shuttle and doing half stitches at start/end of chains to make everything neater (from this YouTube video), and individual rings and chains did look slightly neater than previous attempts.  But even though I was reversing work properly (intuitive guide to reversing work on YouTube), nothing was lying flat.  

So I started over, which is the piece in the middle.  Slightly neater, slightly flatter, but transitions from rings to chains and chains to rings was still not very neat.  I was having a hard time telling where to put threads (front to back?  back to front?) and thought that was the issue.  And so I started over again.  

The piece on right was the best-looking attempt, but again, it's pretty wonky.  I started the second round of the pattern and decided it wasn't getting better.  

Here's that piece on left from a shallower angle:


Obviously something's gone wrong.  I went back to a sample pattern Tatting by the Bay posted, because I recalled something about the red/blue colors being explained in that pdf.  And immediately figured out the issue.  

I assumed the red/blue simply corresponded to shuttle color.  That was a bad assumption.  The colors actually correspond to the color of thread forming stitches on that section of the pattern.  So for rings, I was getting it right, because rings are formed with one shuttle.  But for chains, I was getting it wrong. 

My fourth attempt with threads where they should be:

 

The picots are probably far too large and there are some tension issues still, but everything is lying flat and I don't have to try and figure out where threads are supposed to go when moving between chains and rings.  The ends just sort of intuitively fall where they need to. 

Tatting is a simple fiber craft to pick up, but simple things are more difficult to do well.  And tatting techniques range from tedious to ingenious and innovative all at once. 

At a basic level, tatting is just the double stitch and picots.  And then there are rings versus chains.  But how do you reverse work?  Also, how do you know when to reverse work?  How do you join in new thread?  How do you make neater joins?  What's a cluny leaf?  A split ring?  An onion ring?  What's a magic square?  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I bought a Silver Reed SK10 and SR10 knitting machine!

I've been considering a CSM (circular sock machine) for a while, but my budget has kept me from buying one.  I really want the ability to crank out sock snakes and hand-finish the heels and toes.  I discounted flat-bed machines because how would you knit in the round on a flat-bed machine?   And then I stumbled on a post that said you can in fact knit in the round, or, knit tubular as machine knitters are more likely to say, on a flat-bed machine.  The secret?  A ribbing attachment!  (Or a double bed machine, but those are fairly rare).  So I started the hunt for a knitting machine and ribbing attachment.  I found the perfect machine for me a few weeks ago.  Here it is knitting a ribbed cowl :

Renulek's Rose #3

 Finished product first, of course.      

First (ish) roll from my new to me Kalimar SR200

A few weeks ago, I got a Helios 44 lens, which happened to be attached to a Kalimar SR200/Zenit E camera.  The seller wasn't sure the camera worked, but mechanically, it seemed to function.  The light meter even seemed to work!   The first roll I shot in the camera came out totally blank.  Which was disappointing.  I think the issue is the film holder is very fiddly, either from wear or age.  But I'm happy to report that the second roll was totally fine!  I got 32 photos, despite the back being opened once accidentally during rewinding...